Where can I find some nice Mastodon applications for Android?
Mastodon is where I ended up after looking for an alternative to Twitter not too long ago (although I have a sneaking suspicion that I'm not the only one). I like it there because the majority of the people who live there appear to be intelligent, nice, and less inclined to blow up than they are on Twitter. However, once I got used to the user interface, I recognized that the mobile app, despite the fact that it was accessible, did not live up to my expectations in any way. Therefore, when I learned that there was a brand new one that was still in beta called Ivory and that, according to various accounts, it delivered a significantly better experience, I was excited to try it out.
Then I ran into an issue that I had seen before: Ivory is not compatible with any other operating system except iOS. I use Android.
Now, I've been a user of Android phones for a considerable amount of time. Android is a good operating system, and I've become used to using it, but I don't consider myself an Android fanatic. There is not the slightest thing that I have against iOS or iPhones; in fact, I have one sitting here at my desk that I use for work. There are aspects of Apple's iOS that I prefer, but other aspects of Google's mobile operating system appeal to me more.
On the other hand, I have to admit that when I hear about an app that appears to be really straightforward and helpful, go running to its website to see if I can try it out, and then discover that it is only available for iOS, I can become, for a brief moment, something akin to an enraged five-year-old child. I have a strong resentment toward anyone who says I cannot use this new item since I really want to play with it.
It's not only me who feels this way. On the social networking platform Mastodon, users have recently engaged in some extremely interesting discourse on this topic. Apps that can improve the Mastodon experience are now being sought for by a sizeable number of users who are new to the platform but are accustomed to the user interface of Twitter and the third-party applications that are available through Twitter. It should not come as a surprise that Apple's iOS is producing higher-quality apps than Google's Android platform.
Why? To tell you the truth, there are numerous opportunities, the majority of which have been debated in a number of settings around Mastodon.
These applications were developed by iOS developers and were distributed over Twitter.
As a natural consequence of Elon Musk's decision to ban third-party apps from the Twitter platform, developers who previously worked on Twitter apps are transitioning over to Mastodon. For instance, the software development company Tapbots, which consists of only two people and is responsible for creating Tweetbot as well as a few other applications for iOS and macOS, is currently working on Ivory, which is currently being hailed as the next big thing as far as Mastodon users are concerned. It is clear that they do not have Android on their radar.
The process of developing applications for Android is more difficult.
Apple only releases a handful of new phone models each year, and all of them are designed to work with the company's most recent operating system. On the other hand, the Android operating system can be found on a wide variety of mobile devices produced by a number of manufacturers for a wide variety of various mobile devices; nevertheless, the Android operating system is frequently heavily modified. For instance, Samsung, which is responsible for a big number of the Android phones that are currently available on the market, offers a version of Android whose user interface and the majority of its fundamental functions can be quite different from those of Google's version of Android (which can be found on phones like the Pixel line).
Dealing with those discrepancies requires resources, resources that individual developers and smaller firms might not have access to. JR Raphael, the creator and publisher of Android Intelligence, had this to say about the current state of the mobile app industry: "These days, it's pretty rare to see any large company fail to release an app for both Android and iOS at the same time, with similar priorities. Where I think we see a clear divergence is with the more independent app developers and smaller, startup-based businesses. We do still see places sometimes focusing on iOS initially and then coming back to Android later, down the line, or sometimes even just focusing on iOS exclusively in situations where resources are clearly limited and a company has to make decisions about where its attention is most valuable. This occurs in the kinds of situations where a company must make decisions about where its attention is most valuable. It's a depressing fact of life that I wish we could alter, but it is what it is.
Apple customers have a greater willingness to spend money on their products.
The general public seems to have the impression that those who are active participants in the Apple ecosystem are either better off financially or more prepared to spend more money on their technology. Undoubtedly, Apple is well-known for charging exorbitant costs for its various pieces of goods. And despite the fact that the best Android phones, like those made by Samsung or the most recent Pixels, aren't exactly the cheapest of gadgets, there are a lot of Android phones available for a more affordable price on the market today.
Okay, so here are some numbers to consider: According to Statista.com, the App Store sold over $21.2 billion worth of software during the third quarter of 2022, whereas the Play Store only sold $10.4 billion worth of software. In spite of this, Apple recorded just 2 billion active users in its earnings report for the first quarter of 2023. This figure is 1 billion fewer than the 3 billion active devices that Google announced in its 2021 earnings report. Therefore, unless Google had a loss of more than a billion users over the course of the previous year — which most certainly would have made headlines – the App Store is making a great deal more money despite being utilized by a great deal fewer people. Although a significant portion of that cash is undoubtedly spent on video games, Apple's developers still receive a larger share of the revenue than they do on Android.
Therefore, the perception is supported by some facts to some extent. And this, in addition to the other challenges, means that a smaller company or even an individual developer can feel it makes more financial sense to produce apps for iOS devices (whatever their personal preferences are).
Apple's user interface is more visually appealing.
The argument that Apple's apps are simply more beautiful artistically and from the point of view of the user experience is the one that I felt to be the most interesting of the bunch. It is one of the arguments that I hear frequently from Apple fans, and it is the claim that the user interfaces of applications developed for macOS and iOS are far more aesthetically beautiful and easier to use with than those written to suit Android's operating system. https://ejtandemonium.com/
John Gruber, who writes for the Daring Fireball blog and hosts The Talk Show With John Gruber, has, for instance, released a handful of well-written essays in which he discusses this topic. My attention was particularly drawn to the item titled "Making Our Hearts Sing," the title of which is taken from one of Steve Jobs's final public performances on stage. According to Gruber, "What I think has happened over the last ten years or so is that rather than the two platforms establishing any type of balance, the cultural disparities have instead expanded since both users and developers have self-sorted." People who recognize and appreciate the creative worth of software and interface design have overwhelmingly gravitated toward iOS, whilst people who don't have a tendency to gravitate toward Android. http://sentrateknikaprima.com/
Mastodon is where I ended up after looking for an alternative to Twitter not too long ago (although I have a sneaking suspicion that I'm not the only one). I like it there because the majority of the people who live there appear to be intelligent, nice, and less inclined to blow up than they are on Twitter. However, once I got used to the user interface, I recognized that the mobile app, despite the fact that it was accessible, did not live up to my expectations in any way. Therefore, when I learned that there was a brand new one that was still in beta called Ivory and that, according to various accounts, it delivered a significantly better experience, I was excited to try it out.
Then I ran into an issue that I had seen before: Ivory is not compatible with any other operating system except iOS. I use Android.
Now, I've been a user of Android phones for a considerable amount of time. Android is a good operating system, and I've become used to using it, but I don't consider myself an Android fanatic. There is not the slightest thing that I have against iOS or iPhones; in fact, I have one sitting here at my desk that I use for work. There are aspects of Apple's iOS that I prefer, but other aspects of Google's mobile operating system appeal to me more.
On the other hand, I have to admit that when I hear about an app that appears to be really straightforward and helpful, go running to its website to see if I can try it out, and then discover that it is only available for iOS, I can become, for a brief moment, something akin to an enraged five-year-old child. I have a strong resentment toward anyone who says I cannot use this new item since I really want to play with it.
It's not only me who feels this way. On the social networking platform Mastodon, users have recently engaged in some extremely interesting discourse on this topic. Apps that can improve the Mastodon experience are now being sought for by a sizeable number of users who are new to the platform but are accustomed to the user interface of Twitter and the third-party applications that are available through Twitter. It should not come as a surprise that Apple's iOS is producing higher-quality apps than Google's Android platform.
Why? To tell you the truth, there are numerous opportunities, the majority of which have been debated in a number of settings around Mastodon.
These applications were developed by iOS developers and were distributed over Twitter.
As a natural consequence of Elon Musk's decision to ban third-party apps from the Twitter platform, developers who previously worked on Twitter apps are transitioning over to Mastodon. For instance, the software development company Tapbots, which consists of only two people and is responsible for creating Tweetbot as well as a few other applications for iOS and macOS, is currently working on Ivory, which is currently being hailed as the next big thing as far as Mastodon users are concerned. It is clear that they do not have Android on their radar.
The process of developing applications for Android is more difficult.
Apple only releases a handful of new phone models each year, and all of them are designed to work with the company's most recent operating system. On the other hand, the Android operating system can be found on a wide variety of mobile devices produced by a number of manufacturers for a wide variety of various mobile devices; nevertheless, the Android operating system is frequently heavily modified. For instance, Samsung, which is responsible for a big number of the Android phones that are currently available on the market, offers a version of Android whose user interface and the majority of its fundamental functions can be quite different from those of Google's version of Android (which can be found on phones like the Pixel line).
Dealing with those discrepancies requires resources, resources that individual developers and smaller firms might not have access to. JR Raphael, the creator and publisher of Android Intelligence, had this to say about the current state of the mobile app industry: "These days, it's pretty rare to see any large company fail to release an app for both Android and iOS at the same time, with similar priorities. Where I think we see a clear divergence is with the more independent app developers and smaller, startup-based businesses. We do still see places sometimes focusing on iOS initially and then coming back to Android later, down the line, or sometimes even just focusing on iOS exclusively in situations where resources are clearly limited and a company has to make decisions about where its attention is most valuable. This occurs in the kinds of situations where a company must make decisions about where its attention is most valuable. It's a depressing fact of life that I wish we could alter, but it is what it is.
Apple customers have a greater willingness to spend money on their products.
The general public seems to have the impression that those who are active participants in the Apple ecosystem are either better off financially or more prepared to spend more money on their technology. Undoubtedly, Apple is well-known for charging exorbitant costs for its various pieces of goods. And despite the fact that the best Android phones, like those made by Samsung or the most recent Pixels, aren't exactly the cheapest of gadgets, there are a lot of Android phones available for a more affordable price on the market today.
Okay, so here are some numbers to consider: According to Statista.com, the App Store sold over $21.2 billion worth of software during the third quarter of 2022, whereas the Play Store only sold $10.4 billion worth of software. In spite of this, Apple recorded just 2 billion active users in its earnings report for the first quarter of 2023. This figure is 1 billion fewer than the 3 billion active devices that Google announced in its 2021 earnings report. Therefore, unless Google had a loss of more than a billion users over the course of the previous year — which most certainly would have made headlines – the App Store is making a great deal more money despite being utilized by a great deal fewer people. Although a significant portion of that cash is undoubtedly spent on video games, Apple's developers still receive a larger share of the revenue than they do on Android.
Therefore, the perception is supported by some facts to some extent. And this, in addition to the other challenges, means that a smaller company or even an individual developer can feel it makes more financial sense to produce apps for iOS devices (whatever their personal preferences are).
Apple's user interface is more visually appealing.
The argument that Apple's apps are simply more beautiful artistically and from the point of view of the user experience is the one that I felt to be the most interesting of the bunch. It is one of the arguments that I hear frequently from Apple fans, and it is the claim that the user interfaces of applications developed for macOS and iOS are far more aesthetically beautiful and easier to use with than those written to suit Android's operating system. https://ejtandemonium.com/
John Gruber, who writes for the Daring Fireball blog and hosts The Talk Show With John Gruber, has, for instance, released a handful of well-written essays in which he discusses this topic. My attention was particularly drawn to the item titled "Making Our Hearts Sing," the title of which is taken from one of Steve Jobs's final public performances on stage. According to Gruber, "What I think has happened over the last ten years or so is that rather than the two platforms establishing any type of balance, the cultural disparities have instead expanded since both users and developers have self-sorted." People who recognize and appreciate the creative worth of software and interface design have overwhelmingly gravitated toward iOS, whilst people who don't have a tendency to gravitate toward Android. http://sentrateknikaprima.com/
